{ "schema_name": "Human Value Observatory Research Library", "schema_version": "0.4", "description": "Starter research library for Human Value Observatory. Version 0.4 adds Phase 1 arena/lens taxonomy metadata while preserving legacy category and tag fields.", "fields": { "id": "Stable machine-readable identifier.", "source": "Human-readable source title.", "why_relevant": "Short explanation of relevance to the Observatory.", "source_type": "Organisation, report, paper, article, video, dataset, etc.", "primary_category": "Main category used for website/library navigation.", "human_value_tags": "Tags for human value dimensions.", "ai_impact_tags": "Tags for how AI affects, reveals, reduces, or amplifies human value.", "sector_domain": "Sector, domain, or context.", "framing": "Threat, Opportunity, Mixed, Uncertain, etc.", "evidence_strength": "Initial evidence confidence: Strong, Medium, Weak, Speculative.", "status": "Workflow status such as to_review, reviewed, published, archived.", "notes": "Free text notes.", "url": "Canonical URL, to be added or verified.", "publisher_owner": "Organisation or rights holder most closely associated with the source.", "access_granter": "Platform or organisation that controls practical access to the content.", "publisher_domain": "Domain of the canonical source URL.", "access_status": "open_access, paywalled_or_metered, partial_or_uncertain_access, needs_verification, etc.", "access_model": "Plain-language access model, e.g. free webpage, free PDF, subscription, ad-supported video.", "access_notes": "Notes on paywall, account requirements, link stability, reuse, or uncertainty.", "last_checked": "Date when URL/access metadata was last checked.", "publication_date": "Publication date in ISO format YYYY-MM-DD where known. Leave blank if unknown.", "publication_year": "Publication year as YYYY where full date is unknown.", "date_precision": "Precision of publication date: exact_date, month, year, unknown.", "date_notes": "Notes on publication date uncertainty, edition, revision date, or report year.", "date_checked": "Date when publication date metadata was checked.", "primary_arena": "Primary Arena: where in human life the source is mainly located. Use the arena display name; IDs are defined in taxonomies.arenas.", "secondary_arenas": "Additional Arenas touched by the source. Use arena display names; IDs are defined in taxonomies.arenas.", "relevant_lenses": "Explicit canonical Lens tags for source-level analysis. Kept for compatibility with earlier data exports; same values as lenses where curated.", "text_quality": "Source text quality for retrieval: usable, limited, poor, metadata_only, unknown.", "text_source_type": "How stored text was obtained, such as extracted_text, curated_source_notes, transcript, or user_provided.", "text_last_checked": "Date when source text/chunk status was last checked.", "extraction_notes": "Notes about extraction, chunking, limitations, or why text is unavailable.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Plain-language reuse status for stored text and excerpts.", "citation_allowed": "Whether citation/reference is allowed in Observatory prompts.", "quote_allowed": "Whether short quotation/excerpt display is allowed.", "scale": "Reserved optional source-quality field for future use. Describes the size or level of the affected context; not used in Phase 1 scoring, coverage or confidence.", "reach": "Reserved optional source-quality field for future use. Describes how widely the source claims or evidence may apply; not used in Phase 1 scoring, coverage or confidence.", "evidenceQualityNote": "Reserved optional curator note about evidence limits, uncertainty or quality. Not a reliability score and not used in Phase 1 calculations.", "lenses": "Explicit canonical Human Value Lenses for Evidence Map matching. Use display names defined in taxonomies.lenses." }, "items": [ { "id": "stanford-hai-human-centered-ai", "source": "Stanford HAI — Human-Centered AI", "why_relevant": "Probably the closest institutional neighbour. Focuses on AI that serves, augments and protects human interests. Stanford has also launched an AI and Organizations Lab to study AI’s real workplace impact and how organisations can elevate human potential.", "source_type": "Organisation / Research Institute", "primary_category": "Human-AI Collaboration", "human_value_tags": [ "Agency", "Judgement", "Responsibility" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Augmentation", "Human Bottleneck", "Value Reveal" ], "sector_domain": [ "Cross-sector", "Work", "AI governance" ], "framing": "Opportunity", "evidence_strength": "Strong", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-definitions/what-is-human-centered-ai", "publisher_owner": "Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence", "access_granter": "Stanford HAI", "publisher_domain": "hai.stanford.edu", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public webpage", "access_notes": "Publicly accessible institutional page.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Personhood & Rights", "Society & Institutions" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "ada-lovelace-institute", "source": "Ada Lovelace Institute", "why_relevant": "UK-based, very relevant. Its mission is to ensure data and AI work for people and society, and it publishes reports on AI governance, education, careers guidance, public value and social impact.", "source_type": "Organisation / Research Institute", "primary_category": "Ethics & Governance", "human_value_tags": [ "Dignity", "Agency", "Responsibility" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Human Bottleneck", "Value Reveal" ], "sector_domain": [ "UK", "Public policy", "AI governance" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Strong", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/our-work/", "publisher_owner": "Ada Lovelace Institute / Nuffield Foundation", "access_granter": "Ada Lovelace Institute", "publisher_domain": "adalovelaceinstitute.org", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public website", "access_notes": "Publicly accessible research institute site.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Society & Institutions", "secondary_arenas": [ "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Dignity", "Agency" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Dignity", "Agency" ] }, { "id": "oecd-future-of-work-ai-wips", "source": "OECD Future of Work / AI-WIPS", "why_relevant": "Useful for policy-level framing: AI, employment, skills, productivity, innovation and how governments should respond.", "source_type": "Policy / International Organisation", "primary_category": "Work & Jobs", "human_value_tags": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Replacement", "Augmentation", "Reskilling", "Boundary Shift" ], "sector_domain": [ "Cross-sector", "Labour market", "Public policy" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Strong", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.oecd.org/en/about/programmes/ai-in-work-innovation-productivity-and-skills.html", "publisher_owner": "Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development", "access_granter": "OECD", "publisher_domain": "oecd.org", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public webpage", "access_notes": "Publicly accessible OECD programme page.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Society & Institutions", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "world-economic-forum-future-of-jobs", "source": "World Economic Forum — Future of Jobs", "why_relevant": "Strong source for skills, job disruption, future roles, and employer expectations to 2030. Very useful for asking what humans remain needed for.", "source_type": "Policy / Industry Report", "primary_category": "Work & Jobs", "human_value_tags": [ "Judgement", "Creativity", "Agency" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Replacement", "Reskilling", "Boundary Shift" ], "sector_domain": [ "Cross-sector", "Labour market", "Skills" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Strong", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/", "publisher_owner": "World Economic Forum", "access_granter": "World Economic Forum", "publisher_domain": "weforum.org", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public report page", "access_notes": "Public report page; PDF also available.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Society & Institutions", "Creativity & Meaning", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Judgement", "Agency" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Judgement", "Agency" ] }, { "id": "uk-government-ai-skills-life-work", "source": "UK Government — AI Skills for Life and Work", "why_relevant": "Good UK-specific evidence review on AI education, life skills, work skills and preparedness.", "source_type": "Government Report", "primary_category": "Education & Skills", "human_value_tags": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Reskilling", "Augmentation" ], "sector_domain": [ "UK", "Education", "Work" ], "framing": "Opportunity", "evidence_strength": "Strong", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-skills-for-life-and-work-rapid-evidence-review/ai-skills-for-life-and-work-rapid-evidence-review", "publisher_owner": "UK Government / Department for Science, Innovation and Technology", "access_granter": "GOV.UK", "publisher_domain": "gov.uk", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public government report", "access_notes": "Public UK government HTML report.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": true, "chunked": true, "searchIndexed": true, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": "2026-06-01" }, "primary_arena": "Learning & Knowledge", "secondary_arenas": [ "Work & Economy", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "limited", "text_source_type": "curated_source_notes", "text_last_checked": "2026-06-01", "extraction_notes": "Static Phase 4 seed chunks exist under data/source-text. Curated notes only; not full-text extraction.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Short curated notes only; preserve source link.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "unesco-ai-ethics", "source": "UNESCO AI Ethics", "why_relevant": "Useful for human dignity, ethical dilemmas, bias, AI in courts, autonomous cars, AI art and wider societal questions.", "source_type": "Policy / International Organisation", "primary_category": "Ethics & Governance", "human_value_tags": [ "Dignity", "Responsibility", "Agency", "Judgement" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Human Bottleneck", "Value Reveal", "Boundary Shift" ], "sector_domain": [ "Cross-sector", "Public policy", "Ethics" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Strong", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics/cases", "publisher_owner": "UNESCO", "access_granter": "UNESCO", "publisher_domain": "unesco.org", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public webpage", "access_notes": "Public UNESCO AI ethics examples page.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Society & Institutions", "secondary_arenas": [ "Personhood & Rights", "Learning & Knowledge" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Dignity", "Agency", "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Dignity", "Agency", "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "anthropic-economic-index-labour-market-impacts", "source": "Anthropic Economic Index / Labour Market Impacts", "why_relevant": "Especially useful because it looks at actual AI usage and observed exposure, not just theoretical automation risk.", "source_type": "Industry Research / Dataset", "primary_category": "AI Capability", "human_value_tags": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Replacement", "Augmentation", "Boundary Shift" ], "sector_domain": [ "Labour market", "AI usage", "Cross-sector" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Strong", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/research/labor-market-impacts", "publisher_owner": "Anthropic PBC", "access_granter": "Anthropic", "publisher_domain": "anthropic.com", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public research page", "access_notes": "Public Anthropic research page.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Learning & Knowledge", "secondary_arenas": [ "Work & Economy", "Society & Institutions", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "ai-now-institute", "source": "AI Now Institute", "why_relevant": "Worth adding to the research list. Its angle is power, accountability, labour, surveillance and public-interest AI.", "source_type": "Organisation / Research Institute", "primary_category": "Ethics & Governance", "human_value_tags": [ "Dignity", "Responsibility", "Agency" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Commodification", "Deskilling", "Human Bottleneck" ], "sector_domain": [ "Public policy", "Labour", "AI governance" ], "framing": "Threat", "evidence_strength": "Strong", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://ainowinstitute.org/", "publisher_owner": "AI Now Institute", "access_granter": "AI Now Institute", "publisher_domain": "ainowinstitute.org", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public website", "access_notes": "Public research institute site.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Society & Institutions", "secondary_arenas": [ "Personhood & Rights", "Work & Economy" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Dignity", "Agency" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Dignity", "Agency" ] }, { "id": "center-for-humane-technology", "source": "Center for Humane Technology", "why_relevant": "Relevant adjacent framing: how technology shapes human attention, agency, wellbeing and social structures.", "source_type": "Organisation / Advocacy", "primary_category": "Society & Economy", "human_value_tags": [ "Attention", "Agency", "Meaning", "Relationships" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Value Reveal", "Commodification" ], "sector_domain": [ "Technology", "Society", "Wellbeing" ], "framing": "Threat", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.humanetech.com/", "publisher_owner": "Center for Humane Technology", "access_granter": "Center for Humane Technology", "publisher_domain": "humanetech.com", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public website", "access_notes": "Public nonprofit website.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Society & Institutions", "secondary_arenas": [ "Work & Economy", "Body, Experience & Place", "Family & Care", "Creativity & Meaning", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Meaning" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Meaning" ] }, { "id": "mit-shaping-future-work-david-autor", "source": "MIT Shaping the Future of Work / David Autor", "why_relevant": "Very relevant for the idea that AI may change, devalue, or extend human expertise rather than simply replace jobs.", "source_type": "Academic / Research Programme", "primary_category": "Work & Jobs", "human_value_tags": [ "Expertise", "Judgement", "Agency" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Augmentation", "Commodification", "Boundary Shift", "Reskilling" ], "sector_domain": [ "Labour market", "Economics", "Work" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Strong", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://shapingwork.mit.edu/", "publisher_owner": "MIT Shaping the Future of Work Initiative", "access_granter": "MIT", "publisher_domain": "shapingwork.mit.edu", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public website", "access_notes": "Public MIT initiative site.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Society & Institutions", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Judgement", "Agency" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Judgement", "Agency" ] }, { "id": "wef-future-of-jobs-report-2025", "source": "World Economic Forum — Future of Jobs Report 2025", "why_relevant": "Baseline global report for job disruption, skills outlook, reskilling and future workforce strategy. It surveys over 1,000 employers representing more than 14 million workers.", "source_type": "Policy / Industry Report", "primary_category": "Work & Jobs", "human_value_tags": [ "Judgement", "Creativity", "Agency" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Replacement", "Reskilling", "Boundary Shift" ], "sector_domain": [ "Cross-sector", "Labour market", "Skills" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Strong", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/", "publisher_owner": "World Economic Forum", "access_granter": "World Economic Forum", "publisher_domain": "weforum.org", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public report page", "access_notes": "Public report page; PDF also available.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "2025", "date_precision": "year", "date_notes": "Year inferred from source title; exact publication date not yet verified.", "date_checked": "2026-05-31", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Society & Institutions", "Creativity & Meaning", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Judgement", "Agency" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Judgement", "Agency" ] }, { "id": "pwc-global-ai-jobs-barometer-2025", "source": "PwC — 2025 Global AI Jobs Barometer", "why_relevant": "Useful for the augmentation vs automation split, especially jobs where AI supports human judgement and expertise versus jobs where it substitutes tasks.", "source_type": "Industry Report", "primary_category": "Work & Jobs", "human_value_tags": [ "Judgement", "Expertise", "Agency" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Replacement", "Augmentation", "Boundary Shift" ], "sector_domain": [ "Cross-sector", "Labour market", "Business" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Strong", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/artificial-intelligence/job-barometer/2025/report.pdf", "publisher_owner": "PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited", "access_granter": "PwC", "publisher_domain": "pwc.com", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public PDF", "access_notes": "Public PDF report.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "2025", "date_precision": "year", "date_notes": "Year inferred from source title; exact publication date not yet verified.", "date_checked": "2026-05-31", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Society & Institutions", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Judgement", "Agency" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Judgement", "Agency" ] }, { "id": "uk-parliament-post-ai-employment", "source": "UK Parliament POST — Artificial intelligence and employment", "why_relevant": "Good UK policy briefing. Notes that evidence of widespread AI job loss remains limited, but specific roles and early-career work may be affected.", "source_type": "Government / Parliamentary Briefing", "primary_category": "Work & Jobs", "human_value_tags": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Replacement", "Deskilling", "Boundary Shift" ], "sector_domain": [ "UK", "Labour market", "Public policy" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Strong", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://post.parliament.uk/research-briefings/post-pn-0757/", "publisher_owner": "UK Parliament POST", "access_granter": "UK Parliament", "publisher_domain": "post.parliament.uk", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public parliamentary briefing", "access_notes": "Public UK Parliament POST briefing.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Society & Institutions", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "mckinsey-superagency-workplace", "source": "McKinsey — Superagency in the Workplace", "why_relevant": "Useful business framing: many organisations are investing in AI, but few consider themselves mature in using it.", "source_type": "Industry Report", "primary_category": "Human-AI Collaboration", "human_value_tags": [ "Agency", "Judgement", "Leadership" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Augmentation", "Reskilling", "Amplification" ], "sector_domain": [ "Business", "Cross-sector", "Work" ], "framing": "Opportunity", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/tech-and-ai/our-insights/superagency-in-the-workplace-empowering-people-to-unlock-ais-full-potential-at-work", "publisher_owner": "McKinsey & Company", "access_granter": "McKinsey & Company", "publisher_domain": "mckinsey.com", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public article/report page", "access_notes": "Public page; may present cookie, newsletter or download prompts.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "oecd-skills-outlook-2025", "source": "OECD Skills Outlook 2025", "why_relevant": "Useful for broader human capability framing: literacy, numeracy, adaptive problem solving, opportunity and social progress.", "source_type": "Policy / International Organisation", "primary_category": "Education & Skills", "human_value_tags": [ "Agency", "Judgement", "Wisdom" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Reskilling", "Human Bottleneck" ], "sector_domain": [ "Education", "Skills", "Public policy" ], "framing": "Opportunity", "evidence_strength": "Strong", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/12/oecd-skills-outlook-2025_ac37c7d4.html", "publisher_owner": "Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development", "access_granter": "OECD", "publisher_domain": "oecd.org", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public report page", "access_notes": "Public OECD page; full report page and PDF available.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "2025", "date_precision": "year", "date_notes": "Year inferred from source title; exact publication date not yet verified.", "date_checked": "2026-05-31", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Learning & Knowledge", "secondary_arenas": [ "Work & Economy", "Personhood & Rights", "Society & Institutions" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "ada-lovelace-navigating-future", "source": "Ada Lovelace Institute — Navigating the Future", "why_relevant": "Particularly relevant to young people, careers advice and the need for human guidance alongside digital/AI tools.", "source_type": "Research Report", "primary_category": "Education & Skills", "human_value_tags": [ "Care", "Judgement", "Agency", "Relationships" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Augmentation", "Human Bottleneck", "Value Reveal" ], "sector_domain": [ "Education", "Careers guidance", "Young people" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Strong", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/report/navigating-the-future/", "publisher_owner": "Ada Lovelace Institute / Nuffield Foundation", "access_granter": "Ada Lovelace Institute", "publisher_domain": "adalovelaceinstitute.org", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public report", "access_notes": "Public report page.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Learning & Knowledge", "secondary_arenas": [ "Work & Economy", "Family & Care", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Care", "Judgement", "Agency" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Care", "Judgement", "Agency" ] }, { "id": "sp-global-ai-and-labour", "source": "S&P Global — AI and labour: human capabilities remain essential", "why_relevant": "Useful summary framing: AI will transform labour markets, but emotional intelligence, creativity and complex decision-making remain important.", "source_type": "Industry Analysis", "primary_category": "Work & Jobs", "human_value_tags": [ "Emotional Intelligence", "Creativity", "Judgement" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Augmentation", "Replacement", "Human Bottleneck" ], "sector_domain": [ "Labour market", "Business", "Cross-sector" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.spglobal.com/en/research-insights/special-reports/look-forward/ai-and-labor", "publisher_owner": "S&P Global", "access_granter": "S&P Global", "publisher_domain": "spglobal.com", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public article/report page", "access_notes": "Public page; may contain newsletter, cookie or business-content prompts.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Society & Institutions", "Family & Care", "Creativity & Meaning" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "ai-workers-future-work-skills", "source": "Artificial intelligence, workers, and future of work skills", "why_relevant": "Good academic starting point on AI’s effects on workers and the growing importance of AI literacy and human-centred skills.", "source_type": "Academic Paper", "primary_category": "Education & Skills", "human_value_tags": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Reskilling", "Augmentation", "Boundary Shift" ], "sector_domain": [ "Work", "Skills", "AI literacy" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Strong", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X24000411", "publisher_owner": "Elsevier / ScienceDirect", "access_granter": "ScienceDirect", "publisher_domain": "sciencedirect.com", "access_status": "partial_or_uncertain_access", "access_model": "Abstract/metadata public; full text may depend on journal access", "access_notes": "ScienceDirect page is public, but full text access can vary by article licence or institutional subscription.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Learning & Knowledge", "secondary_arenas": [ "Work & Economy", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "human-centered-ai-foundations-approaches", "source": "Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Foundations and Approaches", "why_relevant": "Strong conceptual foundation. Frames HCAI as AI that serves, augments and empowers humans rather than harming or replacing them.", "source_type": "Academic Paper / Preprint", "primary_category": "Human-AI Collaboration", "human_value_tags": [ "Agency", "Dignity", "Responsibility" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Augmentation", "Human Bottleneck", "Value Reveal" ], "sector_domain": [ "AI research", "AI governance" ], "framing": "Opportunity", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.01247", "publisher_owner": "arXiv / author preprint", "access_granter": "arXiv", "publisher_domain": "arxiv.org", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public preprint", "access_notes": "Public arXiv preprint.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Personhood & Rights", "Society & Institutions" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Dignity" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Dignity" ] }, { "id": "computational-framework-human-values-ethical-ai", "source": "A computational framework of human values for ethical AI", "why_relevant": "Directly relevant to the question of what value is. It treats human values as behaviour-guiding concepts and tries to formalise them for ethical AI.", "source_type": "Academic Paper / Preprint", "primary_category": "Meaning & Philosophy", "human_value_tags": [ "Values", "Responsibility", "Judgement", "Dignity" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Value Reveal", "Human Bottleneck" ], "sector_domain": [ "AI ethics", "Philosophy", "Human values" ], "framing": "Opportunity", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02748", "publisher_owner": "arXiv / author preprint", "access_granter": "arXiv", "publisher_domain": "arxiv.org", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public preprint", "access_notes": "Public arXiv preprint. Published venue may have separate access terms.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Creativity & Meaning", "secondary_arenas": [ "Personhood & Rights", "Learning & Knowledge" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Judgement", "Dignity" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Judgement", "Dignity" ] }, { "id": "next-steps-human-centered-generative-ai", "source": "Next Steps for Human-Centered Generative AI", "why_relevant": "Useful research agenda: aligning with human values, assimilating human intent, and augmenting human abilities.", "source_type": "Academic Paper / Preprint", "primary_category": "Human-AI Collaboration", "human_value_tags": [ "Agency", "Intent", "Judgement" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Augmentation", "Amplification", "Value Reveal" ], "sector_domain": [ "Generative AI", "AI research" ], "framing": "Opportunity", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.15774", "publisher_owner": "arXiv / author preprint", "access_granter": "arXiv", "publisher_domain": "arxiv.org", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public preprint", "access_notes": "Public arXiv preprint.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "future-of-work-with-ai-agents", "source": "Future of Work with AI Agents", "why_relevant": "Very relevant because it introduces a Human Agency Scale and looks at what workers want AI agents to automate or augment.", "source_type": "Academic Paper / Preprint", "primary_category": "Human-AI Collaboration", "human_value_tags": [ "Agency", "Judgement", "Responsibility" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Augmentation", "Replacement", "Human Bottleneck" ], "sector_domain": [ "Work", "AI agents", "Human-AI collaboration" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06576", "publisher_owner": "arXiv / author preprint", "access_granter": "arXiv", "publisher_domain": "arxiv.org", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public preprint", "access_notes": "Public arXiv preprint; associated Stanford data explorer also appears public.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "ai-skills-shift", "source": "The AI Skills Shift", "why_relevant": "Useful for mapping skill obsolescence, emergence and transition pathways. Interesting finding: many observed AI interactions are augmentation rather than automation.", "source_type": "Academic Paper / Preprint", "primary_category": "Education & Skills", "human_value_tags": [ "Agency", "Expertise", "Judgement" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Reskilling", "Deskilling", "Augmentation", "Replacement" ], "sector_domain": [ "Skills", "Work", "Labour market" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.06906", "publisher_owner": "arXiv / author preprint", "access_granter": "arXiv", "publisher_domain": "arxiv.org", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public preprint", "access_notes": "Public arXiv preprint.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Learning & Knowledge", "secondary_arenas": [ "Work & Economy", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "beyond-automation-redesigning-jobs-llms", "source": "Beyond Automation: Redesigning Jobs with LLMs", "why_relevant": "Relevant to the Observatory because it asks how jobs can be redesigned around human comparative advantage: leadership, complex problem solving and stakeholder management.", "source_type": "Academic Paper / Preprint", "primary_category": "Human-AI Collaboration", "human_value_tags": [ "Leadership", "Judgement", "Relationships" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Augmentation", "Reskilling", "Human Bottleneck" ], "sector_domain": [ "Work", "Job design", "LLMs" ], "framing": "Opportunity", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05659", "publisher_owner": "arXiv / author preprint", "access_granter": "arXiv", "publisher_domain": "arxiv.org", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public preprint", "access_notes": "Public arXiv preprint.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Personhood & Rights", "Family & Care" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "generative-ai-transformation-workforce", "source": "Generative AI and the transformation of workforce", "why_relevant": "Useful for job-posting evidence: growth in AI-related skills, decline in routine tasks, and increased importance of hybrid human-AI expertise.", "source_type": "Academic Paper / Preprint", "primary_category": "Work & Jobs", "human_value_tags": [ "Expertise", "Agency", "Judgement" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Reskilling", "Deskilling", "Boundary Shift" ], "sector_domain": [ "Labour market", "Job postings", "Generative AI" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00843", "publisher_owner": "arXiv / author preprint", "access_granter": "arXiv", "publisher_domain": "arxiv.org", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public preprint", "access_notes": "Public arXiv preprint.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Society & Institutions", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "ft-ai-is-here-what-do-you-want-from-it", "source": "FT — “AI is here. What do you want from it?”", "why_relevant": "Good philosophical/public-conversation angle: not just efficiency and profit, but human-centred futures and collective choice.", "source_type": "Article / Essay", "primary_category": "Meaning & Philosophy", "human_value_tags": [ "Meaning", "Agency", "Dignity", "Responsibility" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Value Reveal", "Boundary Shift" ], "sector_domain": [ "Society", "Public debate", "AI future" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.ft.com/content/da80e72b-31e5-42ca-995c-5fc7d457915e", "publisher_owner": "Financial Times", "access_granter": "Financial Times", "publisher_domain": "ft.com", "access_status": "paywalled_or_metered", "access_model": "Subscription / metered access likely", "access_notes": "FT content is commonly behind subscription or metered access. Useful to cite, but not ideal as the only source for public website readers.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Creativity & Meaning", "secondary_arenas": [ "Personhood & Rights", "Learning & Knowledge", "Society & Institutions" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Meaning", "Agency", "Dignity" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Meaning", "Agency", "Dignity" ] }, { "id": "hbs-human-judgement-innovation", "source": "HBS — AI won’t make the call: why human judgement still drives innovation", "why_relevant": "Strong human judgement source. Argues AI cannot reliably distinguish good ideas from mediocre ones or guide long-term strategy alone.", "source_type": "Article / Academic Business Commentary", "primary_category": "Human Capabilities", "human_value_tags": [ "Judgement", "Creativity", "Wisdom", "Responsibility" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Human Bottleneck", "Augmentation", "Value Reveal" ], "sector_domain": [ "Business", "Innovation", "Strategy" ], "framing": "Opportunity", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.hbs.edu/bigs/artificial-intelligence-human-jugment-drives-innovation", "publisher_owner": "Harvard Business School", "access_granter": "Harvard Business School", "publisher_domain": "hbs.edu", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public article", "access_notes": "Public HBS article page.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Learning & Knowledge", "secondary_arenas": [ "Personhood & Rights", "Work & Economy", "Creativity & Meaning" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "hbs-ai-improve-or-eliminate-jobs", "source": "HBS — Will AI improve or eliminate jobs?", "why_relevant": "Useful balanced framing: labour market effects remain uncertain, with disagreement among experts.", "source_type": "Article / Academic Business Commentary", "primary_category": "Work & Jobs", "human_value_tags": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Replacement", "Augmentation", "Boundary Shift" ], "sector_domain": [ "Work", "Labour market", "Business" ], "framing": "Uncertain", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.hbs.edu/bigs/will-artificial-intelligence-improve-or-eliminate-jobs", "publisher_owner": "Harvard Business School", "access_granter": "Harvard Business School", "publisher_domain": "hbs.edu", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public article", "access_notes": "Public HBS article page.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Society & Institutions", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "cambridge-ai-future-of-work", "source": "Cambridge — AI and the future of work", "why_relevant": "Good accessible university article on automation, creativity and decision-making.", "source_type": "Article / University", "primary_category": "Work & Jobs", "human_value_tags": [ "Creativity", "Judgement", "Agency" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Replacement", "Augmentation", "Boundary Shift" ], "sector_domain": [ "Work", "Education", "AI" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.cam.ac.uk/stories/AI-and-the-future-of-work", "publisher_owner": "University of Cambridge", "access_granter": "University of Cambridge", "publisher_domain": "cam.ac.uk", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public article", "access_notes": "Public university feature article.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Society & Institutions", "Creativity & Meaning", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Judgement", "Agency" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Judgement", "Agency" ] }, { "id": "apm-guarding-human-agency", "source": "APM — Guarding human agency", "why_relevant": "Very close to engineering/project-professional context. It explicitly names ethics, empathy, judgement, creativity and critical thought as the profession’s value.", "source_type": "Article / Professional Body", "primary_category": "Human Capabilities", "human_value_tags": [ "Agency", "Ethics", "Empathy", "Judgement", "Creativity" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Human Bottleneck", "Augmentation", "Value Reveal" ], "sector_domain": [ "Project management", "Engineering", "Professional services" ], "framing": "Opportunity", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.apm.org.uk/blog/guarding-human-agency-what-ai-means-for-project-professionals-clients-and-the-institutions-that-support-them/", "publisher_owner": "Association for Project Management", "access_granter": "Association for Project Management", "publisher_domain": "apm.org.uk", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public article", "access_notes": "Public professional-body blog article.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Learning & Knowledge", "secondary_arenas": [ "Personhood & Rights", "Work & Economy", "Creativity & Meaning" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "iriss-generative-ai-social-work", "source": "Iriss — Generative AI, critical thinking and social work practice", "why_relevant": "Good care and human-centred practice source. Frames AI as something that should support, not replace, values such as care, dignity and social justice.", "source_type": "Article / Practice Guidance", "primary_category": "Care & Human Services", "human_value_tags": [ "Care", "Dignity", "Judgement", "Responsibility", "Relationships" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Augmentation", "Human Bottleneck", "Value Reveal" ], "sector_domain": [ "Social work", "Care", "Public services" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://iriss.org.uk/resource/generative-ai-critical-thinking-and-social-work-practice/", "publisher_owner": "Iriss", "access_granter": "Iriss", "publisher_domain": "iriss.org.uk", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public practice resource", "access_notes": "Public practice resource.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": true, "chunked": true, "searchIndexed": true, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": "2026-06-01" }, "primary_arena": "Family & Care", "secondary_arenas": [ "Body, Experience & Place", "Society & Institutions", "Personhood & Rights", "Learning & Knowledge", "Work & Economy" ], "text_quality": "limited", "text_source_type": "curated_source_notes", "extraction_notes": "Static Phase 4 seed chunks exist under data/source-text. Curated notes only; not full-text extraction.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Short curated notes only; preserve source link.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "text_last_checked": "2026-06-01", "lenses": [ "Care", "Dignity", "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Care", "Dignity", "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "vox-ai-successionism", "source": "Vox — The people who actually want AI to replace humanity", "why_relevant": "Useful as a provocative opposite-position source. It discusses AI successionism and argues for a renewed humanism.", "source_type": "Article / Essay", "primary_category": "Opposing Views", "human_value_tags": [ "Dignity", "Meaning", "Agency" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Replacement", "Value Reveal", "Boundary Shift" ], "sector_domain": [ "Philosophy", "Public debate", "AI futures" ], "framing": "Threat", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/489976/ai-successionism-transhumanism-posthumanism", "publisher_owner": "Vox Media", "access_granter": "Vox", "publisher_domain": "vox.com", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public article, ad-supported", "access_notes": "Public article; may include ads, newsletter or consent prompts.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Society & Institutions", "secondary_arenas": [ "Personhood & Rights", "Creativity & Meaning" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Dignity", "Meaning", "Agency" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Dignity", "Meaning", "Agency" ] }, { "id": "fei-fei-li-human-centered-ai-built", "source": "Fei-Fei Li — How Human-Centered AI Actually Gets Built", "why_relevant": "Very relevant foundation video: human values, human-centred AI, civilisational technology.", "source_type": "Video / Talk", "primary_category": "Human-AI Collaboration", "human_value_tags": [ "Agency", "Dignity", "Responsibility" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Augmentation", "Value Reveal" ], "sector_domain": [ "AI research", "Public debate", "Technology" ], "framing": "Opportunity", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=be0gLzeBX5w", "publisher_owner": "YouTube channel owner / video creator", "access_granter": "YouTube", "publisher_domain": "youtube.com", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free streaming video, ad-supported", "access_notes": "Public YouTube video; availability can vary by region, account settings or future takedown.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Personhood & Rights", "Society & Institutions" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Dignity" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Dignity" ] }, { "id": "fei-fei-li-human-centered-ai", "source": "Dr Fei-Fei Li on Human-Centered AI", "why_relevant": "Good introductory framing for why human-centred is not just a slogan.", "source_type": "Video / Interview", "primary_category": "Human-AI Collaboration", "human_value_tags": [ "Agency", "Dignity", "Responsibility" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Augmentation", "Value Reveal" ], "sector_domain": [ "AI research", "Technology", "Public debate" ], "framing": "Opportunity", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06M_xmHmDfw", "publisher_owner": "YouTube channel owner / video creator", "access_granter": "YouTube", "publisher_domain": "youtube.com", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free streaming video, ad-supported", "access_notes": "Public YouTube video; availability can vary by region, account settings or future takedown.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Personhood & Rights", "Society & Institutions" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Dignity" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Dignity" ] }, { "id": "andrew-ng-fei-fei-li-human-centered-ai", "source": "Andrew Ng and Fei-Fei Li discuss Human-Centered AI", "why_relevant": "Good for mainstream AI voices discussing the human-centred framing.", "source_type": "Video / Discussion", "primary_category": "Human-AI Collaboration", "human_value_tags": [ "Agency", "Dignity", "Responsibility" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Augmentation", "Value Reveal" ], "sector_domain": [ "AI research", "Technology", "Public debate" ], "framing": "Opportunity", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNhC6Ox0T0o", "publisher_owner": "Stanford Online / YouTube channel owner", "access_granter": "YouTube", "publisher_domain": "youtube.com", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free streaming video, ad-supported", "access_notes": "Public YouTube video; availability can vary by region, account settings or future takedown.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Personhood & Rights", "Society & Institutions" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Dignity" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Dignity" ] }, { "id": "david-autor-expertise-ai-work-future", "source": "David Autor — Expertise, AI, and the Work of the Future", "why_relevant": "Highly relevant to the Observatory. Autor’s work is useful because he frames AI around expertise, labour value and how technology changes work.", "source_type": "Video / Talk", "primary_category": "Work & Jobs", "human_value_tags": [ "Expertise", "Judgement", "Agency" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Augmentation", "Commodification", "Boundary Shift" ], "sector_domain": [ "Work", "Economics", "Labour market" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Strong", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_6Gw-oL74g", "publisher_owner": "YouTube channel owner / video creator", "access_granter": "YouTube", "publisher_domain": "youtube.com", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free streaming video, ad-supported", "access_notes": "Public YouTube video; availability can vary by region, account settings or future takedown.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Society & Institutions", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Judgement", "Agency" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Judgement", "Agency" ] }, { "id": "david-autor-ai-wont-decide-future-work", "source": "AI Won’t Decide the Future of Work — We Will, with David Autor", "why_relevant": "The title alone fits the Observatory’s mission: AI outcomes are not predetermined; humans, institutions and policy choices matter.", "source_type": "Video / Talk", "primary_category": "Work & Jobs", "human_value_tags": [ "Agency", "Judgement", "Responsibility" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Boundary Shift", "Value Reveal", "Augmentation" ], "sector_domain": [ "Work", "Public policy", "Labour market" ], "framing": "Opportunity", "evidence_strength": "Strong", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=AI+Won%E2%80%99t+Decide+the+Future+of+Work+We+Will+David+Autor", "publisher_owner": "Unknown / to verify", "access_granter": "YouTube", "publisher_domain": "youtube.com", "access_status": "needs_verification", "access_model": "Search result placeholder", "access_notes": "Specific canonical video URL needs manual verification. Current URL is a YouTube search query, not a stable source.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Needs review" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Society & Institutions", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "mit-stone-center-ai-and-work-playlist", "source": "MIT Stone Center — AI and Work playlist", "why_relevant": "Useful ongoing source for work, inequality, expertise and pro-worker AI.", "source_type": "Video Playlist / Research Centre", "primary_category": "Work & Jobs", "human_value_tags": [ "Agency", "Expertise", "Dignity" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Augmentation", "Commodification", "Boundary Shift" ], "sector_domain": [ "Work", "Inequality", "Economics" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Strong", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL0GFr20m_eBJg2JbZMw9x3kTQsfpY1NdT", "publisher_owner": "MIT Stone Center on Inequality & Shaping Work", "access_granter": "YouTube", "publisher_domain": "youtube.com", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public playlist, ad-supported", "access_notes": "Public YouTube playlist; availability can vary by region, account settings or future takedown.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Work & Economy", "secondary_arenas": [ "Learning & Knowledge", "Society & Institutions", "Personhood & Rights" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Dignity" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Dignity" ] }, { "id": "wef-ai-6-experts", "source": "WEF — Where will AI take us? 6 experts discuss", "why_relevant": "More accessible public-facing material on skills, human-centred roles and future work.", "source_type": "Video / Panel", "primary_category": "Society & Economy", "human_value_tags": [ "Agency", "Judgement", "Creativity" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Augmentation", "Replacement", "Boundary Shift" ], "sector_domain": [ "Future of work", "Society", "Skills" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Medium", "status": "to_review", "notes": "", "url": "https://www.weforum.org/videos/ai-6-experts/", "publisher_owner": "World Economic Forum", "access_granter": "World Economic Forum", "publisher_domain": "weforum.org", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public video page", "access_notes": "Public WEF video page.", "last_checked": "2026-05-31", "publication_date": "", "publication_year": "", "date_precision": "unknown", "date_notes": "", "date_checked": "", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Society & Institutions", "secondary_arenas": [ "Work & Economy", "Creativity & Meaning", "Personhood & Rights", "Learning & Knowledge" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Agency", "Judgement" ] }, { "id": "pope-leo-xiv-magnifica-humanitas", "source": "Pope Leo XIV — Magnifica Humanitas", "why_relevant": "Major Catholic social teaching source focused directly on safeguarding the human person in the time of artificial intelligence. Useful for dignity, common good, work, freedom, governance, power, communication and the moral limits of technological development.", "source_type": "Encyclical / Religious Social Teaching", "primary_category": "Ethics & Governance", "human_value_tags": [ "Dignity", "Agency", "Responsibility", "Care", "Meaning", "Work" ], "ai_impact_tags": [ "Human Bottleneck", "Value Reveal", "Boundary Shift", "Commodification", "Deskilling", "Augmentation" ], "sector_domain": [ "AI ethics", "Catholic social teaching", "Public policy", "Work", "Human dignity" ], "framing": "Mixed", "evidence_strength": "Strong", "status": "to_review", "notes": "Official Holy See page. Signed 2026-05-15; Vatican event/public presentation listed for 2026-05-25.", "url": "https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/en/encyclicals/documents/20260515-magnifica-humanitas.html", "publisher_owner": "The Holy See", "access_granter": "Vatican.va", "publisher_domain": "vatican.va", "access_status": "open_access", "access_model": "Free public webpage", "access_notes": "Official Vatican HTML page with language variants; public access checked on 2026-06-03.", "last_checked": "2026-06-03", "publication_date": "2026-05-15", "publication_year": "2026", "date_precision": "exact_date", "date_notes": "Official encyclical page is dated 15 May 2026; Vatican calendar entry identifies the first encyclical event on 25 May 2026.", "date_checked": "2026-06-03", "analysisReadiness": { "promptReady": true, "analysisReady": false, "reviewed": false, "readinessLabel": "Limited metadata" }, "processing": { "textExtracted": false, "chunked": false, "searchIndexed": false, "embeddingIndexed": false, "ragReady": false, "lastProcessedAt": null }, "primary_arena": "Society & Institutions", "secondary_arenas": [ "Personhood & Rights", "Work & Economy", "Learning & Knowledge", "Creativity & Meaning" ], "text_quality": "metadata_only", "text_source_type": "metadata_only", "text_last_checked": "", "extraction_notes": "No stored source text chunks yet. Full text remains on official Vatican source page.", "copyright_reuse_status": "Metadata only; source text not stored. Cite the official source page rather than republishing full text.", "citation_allowed": true, "quote_allowed": false, "lenses": [ "Dignity", "Agency", "Care", "Power", "Meaning", "Boundary" ], "relevant_lenses": [ "Dignity", "Agency", "Care", "Power", "Meaning", "Boundary" ] } ], "website_filter_config": { "default_visible_filters": [ { "field": "primary_arena", "label": "Primary arena", "control": "multi_select", "description": "Arena answers where in human life the source is mainly located." }, { "field": "secondary_arenas", "label": "Secondary arenas", "control": "multi_select", "description": "Additional arenas touched by the source." }, { "field": "source_type", "label": "Source type", "control": "multi_select", "description": "Article, paper, report, video, organisation, dataset, etc." }, { "field": "human_value_tags", "label": "Value themes", "control": "multi_select", "description": "The value, activity, role or concern being investigated." }, { "field": "ai_impact_tags", "label": "AI impact", "control": "multi_select", "description": "Replacement, augmentation, deskilling, value reveal, boundary shift, etc." }, { "field": "access_status", "label": "Access", "control": "multi_select", "description": "Open access, paywalled, uncertain, needs verification." }, { "field": "publication_year", "label": "Publication year", "control": "year_range", "description": "Filter by publication year or date where known." } ], "advanced_revealable_filters": [ { "field": "primary_category", "label": "Primary category (legacy)", "control": "multi_select", "description": "Legacy/general classification retained for compatibility." }, { "field": "sector_domain", "label": "Sector / domain", "control": "multi_select", "description": "Healthcare, education, engineering, labour market, public policy, etc." }, { "field": "framing", "label": "Risk / opportunity framing", "control": "multi_select", "description": "Threat, opportunity, mixed, uncertain, speculative." }, { "field": "evidence_strength", "label": "Evidence strength", "control": "multi_select", "description": "Strong, medium, weak, speculative." }, { "field": "publisher_owner", "label": "Publisher / owner", "control": "multi_select", "description": "Organisation or rights holder most closely associated with the source." }, { "field": "publisher_domain", "label": "Publisher domain", "control": "multi_select", "description": "Domain of the canonical source URL." }, { "field": "access_model", "label": "Access model", "control": "multi_select", "description": "Free public webpage, free PDF, subscription, ad-supported video, etc." }, { "field": "date_precision", "label": "Date precision", "control": "multi_select", "description": "Exact date, month, year, or unknown." } ], "custom_tag_groups": { "enabled": true, "description": "Users can choose which tag groups/metadata fields are visible as filters and card badges.", "recommended_ui": [ "Show default filters first.", "Add a 'Customise filters' button or drawer.", "Let users tick which filters and tag groups to reveal.", "Remember the user's filter visibility choices in localStorage.", "Add a 'Reset filters' and 'Reset visible fields' option." ] }, "default_card_fields": [ "source", "why_relevant", "primary_arena", "secondary_arenas", "source_type", "human_value_tags", "ai_impact_tags", "access_status", "publication_year", "url" ], "optional_card_fields": [ "primary_category", "publisher_owner", "access_model", "access_notes", "sector_domain", "framing", "evidence_strength", "publication_date", "date_precision", "last_checked" ] }, "taxonomies": { "arenas": [ { "id": "work-economy", "name": "Work & Economy", "definition": "Jobs, labour markets, organisations, productivity, business, skills, economic security and how value is created or rewarded.", "questions": [ "What work, role or economic activity is being changed?", "Who benefits materially, and who carries the cost?", "What forms of human capability remain valuable here?" ] }, { "id": "family-care", "name": "Family & Care", "definition": "Caregiving, family life, dependency, emotional labour, health support, relationships and responsibilities for others.", "questions": [ "Where does responsibility for another person appear?", "What kinds of presence, trust or judgement are required?", "What forms of care are supported, displaced or made harder to see?" ] }, { "id": "society-institutions", "name": "Society & Institutions", "definition": "Public life, governance, law, civic trust, media, organisations, social systems and collective decision-making.", "questions": [ "Which public, civic or institutional systems are involved?", "How are legitimacy, accountability or trust affected?", "What collective decisions become easier, harder or less visible?" ] }, { "id": "personhood-rights", "name": "Personhood & Rights", "definition": "Identity, dignity, autonomy, rights, privacy, accountability, consent and recognition of people as moral and legal subjects.", "questions": [ "How is the person represented, classified or acted upon?", "Where do autonomy, consent, privacy or accountability matter?", "What would respectful treatment require in this case?" ] }, { "id": "learning-knowledge", "name": "Learning & Knowledge", "definition": "Education, skills, expertise, research, judgement, knowledge creation and transmission.", "questions": [ "What kind of knowledge or expertise is at stake?", "How are learning, judgement and skill formation affected?", "What should people still understand for themselves?" ] }, { "id": "creativity-meaning", "name": "Creativity & Meaning", "definition": "Art, culture, expression, purpose, interpretation, imagination, values and shared meaning.", "questions": [ "What expression, interpretation or cultural practice is involved?", "How are authorship, originality or purpose being changed?", "What meaning would be lost if the human role disappeared?" ] }, { "id": "body-experience-place", "name": "Body, Experience & Place", "definition": "Embodiment, health, lived experience, environment, local context, presence and the places where human life happens.", "questions": [ "What embodied, local or lived experience is involved?", "How do place, context or presence affect what matters?", "What does remote, automated or abstracted treatment miss?" ] } ], "lenses": [ { "id": "agency", "name": "Agency", "definition": "Who can choose, act, refuse, consent or shape outcomes?" }, { "id": "judgement", "name": "Judgement", "definition": "Where are interpretation, discretion, expertise or practical wisdom needed?" }, { "id": "capability", "name": "Capability", "definition": "What human abilities are strengthened, weakened, redistributed or made newly possible?" }, { "id": "dignity", "name": "Dignity", "definition": "How are people recognised, respected, represented or reduced?" }, { "id": "care", "name": "Care", "definition": "Where do responsibility, attention, dependency, presence or relational obligation matter?" }, { "id": "power", "name": "Power", "definition": "Who gains control, leverage, authority, visibility or economic advantage?" }, { "id": "boundary", "name": "Boundary", "definition": "What line between human, machine, institution, body, place or role is being moved?" }, { "id": "meaning", "name": "Meaning", "definition": "What purpose, identity, culture, interpretation or shared significance is at stake?" } ], "terminology": { "arena": "Arena = where in human life we are looking.", "lens": "Lens = the analytical question being applied.", "source": "Source = evidence for a claim, pattern or uncertainty.", "analysis": "Analysis = interpretation that creates meaning from sources.", "value_theme": "Value theme = the kind of value, activity, role or concern being investigated.", "ai_impact_tag": "AI impact tag = how AI may be changing it.", "framing": "Arenas locate the issue. Lenses interrogate the value. Sources provide evidence. Analysis creates meaning." }, "arena_lens_descriptions": [ { "id": "work-economy__agency", "arenaId": "work-economy", "arenaName": "Work & Economy", "lensId": "agency", "lensName": "Agency", "prompt": "In Work & Economy, ask: Who can choose, act, refuse, consent or shape outcomes?", "description": "Work & Economy locates the issue in jobs, labour markets, organisations, productivity, business, skills, economic security and how value is created or rewarded. The Agency lens asks: Who can choose, act, refuse, consent or shape outcomes?" }, { "id": "work-economy__judgement", "arenaId": "work-economy", "arenaName": "Work & Economy", "lensId": "judgement", "lensName": "Judgement", "prompt": "In Work & Economy, ask: Where are interpretation, discretion, expertise or practical wisdom needed?", "description": "Work & Economy locates the issue in jobs, labour markets, organisations, productivity, business, skills, economic security and how value is created or rewarded. The Judgement lens asks: Where are interpretation, discretion, expertise or practical wisdom needed?" }, { "id": "work-economy__capability", "arenaId": "work-economy", "arenaName": "Work & Economy", "lensId": "capability", "lensName": "Capability", "prompt": "In Work & Economy, ask: What human abilities are strengthened, weakened, redistributed or made newly possible?", "description": "Work & Economy locates the issue in jobs, labour markets, organisations, productivity, business, skills, economic security and how value is created or rewarded. The Capability lens asks: What human abilities are strengthened, weakened, redistributed or made newly possible?" }, { "id": "work-economy__dignity", "arenaId": "work-economy", "arenaName": "Work & Economy", "lensId": "dignity", "lensName": "Dignity", "prompt": "In Work & Economy, ask: How are people recognised, respected, represented or reduced?", "description": "Work & Economy locates the issue in jobs, labour markets, organisations, productivity, business, skills, economic security and how value is created or rewarded. The Dignity lens asks: How are people recognised, respected, represented or reduced?" }, { "id": "work-economy__care", "arenaId": "work-economy", "arenaName": "Work & Economy", "lensId": "care", "lensName": "Care", "prompt": "In Work & Economy, ask: Where do responsibility, attention, dependency, presence or relational obligation matter?", "description": "Work & Economy locates the issue in jobs, labour markets, organisations, productivity, business, skills, economic security and how value is created or rewarded. The Care lens asks: Where do responsibility, attention, dependency, presence or relational obligation matter?" }, { "id": "work-economy__power", "arenaId": "work-economy", "arenaName": "Work & Economy", "lensId": "power", "lensName": "Power", "prompt": "In Work & Economy, ask: Who gains control, leverage, authority, visibility or economic advantage?", "description": "Work & Economy locates the issue in jobs, labour markets, organisations, productivity, business, skills, economic security and how value is created or rewarded. The Power lens asks: Who gains control, leverage, authority, visibility or economic advantage?" }, { "id": "work-economy__boundary", "arenaId": "work-economy", "arenaName": "Work & Economy", "lensId": "boundary", "lensName": "Boundary", "prompt": "In Work & Economy, ask: What line between human, machine, institution, body, place or role is being moved?", "description": "Work & Economy locates the issue in jobs, labour markets, organisations, productivity, business, skills, economic security and how value is created or rewarded. The Boundary lens asks: What line between human, machine, institution, body, place or role is being moved?" }, { "id": "work-economy__meaning", "arenaId": "work-economy", "arenaName": "Work & Economy", "lensId": "meaning", "lensName": "Meaning", "prompt": "In Work & Economy, ask: What purpose, identity, culture, interpretation or shared significance is at stake?", "description": "Work & Economy locates the issue in jobs, labour markets, organisations, productivity, business, skills, economic security and how value is created or rewarded. The Meaning lens asks: What purpose, identity, culture, interpretation or shared significance is at stake?" }, { "id": "family-care__agency", "arenaId": "family-care", "arenaName": "Family & Care", "lensId": "agency", "lensName": "Agency", "prompt": "In Family & Care, ask: Who can choose, act, refuse, consent or shape outcomes?", "description": "Family & Care locates the issue in caregiving, family life, dependency, emotional labour, health support, relationships and responsibilities for others. The Agency lens asks: Who can choose, act, refuse, consent or shape outcomes?" }, { "id": "family-care__judgement", "arenaId": "family-care", "arenaName": "Family & Care", "lensId": "judgement", "lensName": "Judgement", "prompt": "In Family & Care, ask: Where are interpretation, discretion, expertise or practical wisdom needed?", "description": "Family & Care locates the issue in caregiving, family life, dependency, emotional labour, health support, relationships and responsibilities for others. The Judgement lens asks: Where are interpretation, discretion, expertise or practical wisdom needed?" }, { "id": "family-care__capability", "arenaId": "family-care", "arenaName": "Family & Care", "lensId": "capability", "lensName": "Capability", "prompt": "In Family & Care, ask: What human abilities are strengthened, weakened, redistributed or made newly possible?", "description": "Family & Care locates the issue in caregiving, family life, dependency, emotional labour, health support, relationships and responsibilities for others. The Capability lens asks: What human abilities are strengthened, weakened, redistributed or made newly possible?" }, { "id": "family-care__dignity", "arenaId": "family-care", "arenaName": "Family & Care", "lensId": "dignity", "lensName": "Dignity", "prompt": "In Family & Care, ask: How are people recognised, respected, represented or reduced?", "description": "Family & Care locates the issue in caregiving, family life, dependency, emotional labour, health support, relationships and responsibilities for others. The Dignity lens asks: How are people recognised, respected, represented or reduced?" }, { "id": "family-care__care", "arenaId": "family-care", "arenaName": "Family & Care", "lensId": "care", "lensName": "Care", "prompt": "In Family & Care, ask: Where do responsibility, attention, dependency, presence or relational obligation matter?", "description": "Family & Care locates the issue in caregiving, family life, dependency, emotional labour, health support, relationships and responsibilities for others. The Care lens asks: Where do responsibility, attention, dependency, presence or relational obligation matter?" }, { "id": "family-care__power", "arenaId": "family-care", "arenaName": "Family & Care", "lensId": "power", "lensName": "Power", "prompt": "In Family & Care, ask: Who gains control, leverage, authority, visibility or economic advantage?", "description": "Family & Care locates the issue in caregiving, family life, dependency, emotional labour, health support, relationships and responsibilities for others. The Power lens asks: Who gains control, leverage, authority, visibility or economic advantage?" }, { "id": "family-care__boundary", "arenaId": "family-care", "arenaName": "Family & Care", "lensId": "boundary", "lensName": "Boundary", "prompt": "In Family & Care, ask: What line between human, machine, institution, body, place or role is being moved?", "description": "Family & Care locates the issue in caregiving, family life, dependency, emotional labour, health support, relationships and responsibilities for others. The Boundary lens asks: What line between human, machine, institution, body, place or role is being moved?" }, { "id": "family-care__meaning", "arenaId": "family-care", "arenaName": "Family & Care", "lensId": "meaning", "lensName": "Meaning", "prompt": "In Family & Care, ask: What purpose, identity, culture, interpretation or shared significance is at stake?", "description": "Family & Care locates the issue in caregiving, family life, dependency, emotional labour, health support, relationships and responsibilities for others. The Meaning lens asks: What purpose, identity, culture, interpretation or shared significance is at stake?" }, { "id": "society-institutions__agency", "arenaId": "society-institutions", "arenaName": "Society & Institutions", "lensId": "agency", "lensName": "Agency", "prompt": "In Society & Institutions, ask: Who can choose, act, refuse, consent or shape outcomes?", "description": "Society & Institutions locates the issue in public life, governance, law, civic trust, media, organisations, social systems and collective decision-making. The Agency lens asks: Who can choose, act, refuse, consent or shape outcomes?" }, { "id": "society-institutions__judgement", "arenaId": "society-institutions", "arenaName": "Society & Institutions", "lensId": "judgement", "lensName": "Judgement", "prompt": "In Society & Institutions, ask: Where are interpretation, discretion, expertise or practical wisdom needed?", "description": "Society & Institutions locates the issue in public life, governance, law, civic trust, media, organisations, social systems and collective decision-making. The Judgement lens asks: Where are interpretation, discretion, expertise or practical wisdom needed?" }, { "id": "society-institutions__capability", "arenaId": "society-institutions", "arenaName": "Society & Institutions", "lensId": "capability", "lensName": "Capability", "prompt": "In Society & Institutions, ask: What human abilities are strengthened, weakened, redistributed or made newly possible?", "description": "Society & Institutions locates the issue in public life, governance, law, civic trust, media, organisations, social systems and collective decision-making. The Capability lens asks: What human abilities are strengthened, weakened, redistributed or made newly possible?" }, { "id": "society-institutions__dignity", "arenaId": "society-institutions", "arenaName": "Society & Institutions", "lensId": "dignity", "lensName": "Dignity", "prompt": "In Society & Institutions, ask: How are people recognised, respected, represented or reduced?", "description": "Society & Institutions locates the issue in public life, governance, law, civic trust, media, organisations, social systems and collective decision-making. The Dignity lens asks: How are people recognised, respected, represented or reduced?" }, { "id": "society-institutions__care", "arenaId": "society-institutions", "arenaName": "Society & Institutions", "lensId": "care", "lensName": "Care", "prompt": "In Society & Institutions, ask: Where do responsibility, attention, dependency, presence or relational obligation matter?", "description": "Society & Institutions locates the issue in public life, governance, law, civic trust, media, organisations, social systems and collective decision-making. The Care lens asks: Where do responsibility, attention, dependency, presence or relational obligation matter?" }, { "id": "society-institutions__power", "arenaId": "society-institutions", "arenaName": "Society & Institutions", "lensId": "power", "lensName": "Power", "prompt": "In Society & Institutions, ask: Who gains control, leverage, authority, visibility or economic advantage?", "description": "Society & Institutions locates the issue in public life, governance, law, civic trust, media, organisations, social systems and collective decision-making. The Power lens asks: Who gains control, leverage, authority, visibility or economic advantage?" }, { "id": "society-institutions__boundary", "arenaId": "society-institutions", "arenaName": "Society & Institutions", "lensId": "boundary", "lensName": "Boundary", "prompt": "In Society & Institutions, ask: What line between human, machine, institution, body, place or role is being moved?", "description": "Society & Institutions locates the issue in public life, governance, law, civic trust, media, organisations, social systems and collective decision-making. The Boundary lens asks: What line between human, machine, institution, body, place or role is being moved?" }, { "id": "society-institutions__meaning", "arenaId": "society-institutions", "arenaName": "Society & Institutions", "lensId": "meaning", "lensName": "Meaning", "prompt": "In Society & Institutions, ask: What purpose, identity, culture, interpretation or shared significance is at stake?", "description": "Society & Institutions locates the issue in public life, governance, law, civic trust, media, organisations, social systems and collective decision-making. The Meaning lens asks: What purpose, identity, culture, interpretation or shared significance is at stake?" }, { "id": "personhood-rights__agency", "arenaId": "personhood-rights", "arenaName": "Personhood & Rights", "lensId": "agency", "lensName": "Agency", "prompt": "In Personhood & Rights, ask: Who can choose, act, refuse, consent or shape outcomes?", "description": "Personhood & Rights locates the issue in identity, dignity, autonomy, rights, privacy, accountability, consent and recognition of people as moral and legal subjects. The Agency lens asks: Who can choose, act, refuse, consent or shape outcomes?" }, { "id": "personhood-rights__judgement", "arenaId": "personhood-rights", "arenaName": "Personhood & Rights", "lensId": "judgement", "lensName": "Judgement", "prompt": "In Personhood & Rights, ask: Where are interpretation, discretion, expertise or practical wisdom needed?", "description": "Personhood & Rights locates the issue in identity, dignity, autonomy, rights, privacy, accountability, consent and recognition of people as moral and legal subjects. The Judgement lens asks: Where are interpretation, discretion, expertise or practical wisdom needed?" }, { "id": "personhood-rights__capability", "arenaId": "personhood-rights", "arenaName": "Personhood & Rights", "lensId": "capability", "lensName": "Capability", "prompt": "In Personhood & Rights, ask: What human abilities are strengthened, weakened, redistributed or made newly possible?", "description": "Personhood & Rights locates the issue in identity, dignity, autonomy, rights, privacy, accountability, consent and recognition of people as moral and legal subjects. The Capability lens asks: What human abilities are strengthened, weakened, redistributed or made newly possible?" }, { "id": "personhood-rights__dignity", "arenaId": "personhood-rights", "arenaName": "Personhood & Rights", "lensId": "dignity", "lensName": "Dignity", "prompt": "In Personhood & Rights, ask: How are people recognised, respected, represented or reduced?", "description": "Personhood & Rights locates the issue in identity, dignity, autonomy, rights, privacy, accountability, consent and recognition of people as moral and legal subjects. The Dignity lens asks: How are people recognised, respected, represented or reduced?" }, { "id": "personhood-rights__care", "arenaId": "personhood-rights", "arenaName": "Personhood & Rights", "lensId": "care", "lensName": "Care", "prompt": "In Personhood & Rights, ask: Where do responsibility, attention, dependency, presence or relational obligation matter?", "description": "Personhood & Rights locates the issue in identity, dignity, autonomy, rights, privacy, accountability, consent and recognition of people as moral and legal subjects. The Care lens asks: Where do responsibility, attention, dependency, presence or relational obligation matter?" }, { "id": "personhood-rights__power", "arenaId": "personhood-rights", "arenaName": "Personhood & Rights", "lensId": "power", "lensName": "Power", "prompt": "In Personhood & Rights, ask: Who gains control, leverage, authority, visibility or economic advantage?", "description": "Personhood & Rights locates the issue in identity, dignity, autonomy, rights, privacy, accountability, consent and recognition of people as moral and legal subjects. The Power lens asks: Who gains control, leverage, authority, visibility or economic advantage?" }, { "id": "personhood-rights__boundary", "arenaId": "personhood-rights", "arenaName": "Personhood & Rights", "lensId": "boundary", "lensName": "Boundary", "prompt": "In Personhood & Rights, ask: What line between human, machine, institution, body, place or role is being moved?", "description": "Personhood & Rights locates the issue in identity, dignity, autonomy, rights, privacy, accountability, consent and recognition of people as moral and legal subjects. The Boundary lens asks: What line between human, machine, institution, body, place or role is being moved?" }, { "id": "personhood-rights__meaning", "arenaId": "personhood-rights", "arenaName": "Personhood & Rights", "lensId": "meaning", "lensName": "Meaning", "prompt": "In Personhood & Rights, ask: What purpose, identity, culture, interpretation or shared significance is at stake?", "description": "Personhood & Rights locates the issue in identity, dignity, autonomy, rights, privacy, accountability, consent and recognition of people as moral and legal subjects. The Meaning lens asks: What purpose, identity, culture, interpretation or shared significance is at stake?" }, { "id": "learning-knowledge__agency", "arenaId": "learning-knowledge", "arenaName": "Learning & Knowledge", "lensId": "agency", "lensName": "Agency", "prompt": "In Learning & Knowledge, ask: Who can choose, act, refuse, consent or shape outcomes?", "description": "Learning & Knowledge locates the issue in education, skills, expertise, research, judgement, knowledge creation and transmission. The Agency lens asks: Who can choose, act, refuse, consent or shape outcomes?" }, { "id": "learning-knowledge__judgement", "arenaId": "learning-knowledge", "arenaName": "Learning & Knowledge", "lensId": "judgement", "lensName": "Judgement", "prompt": "In Learning & Knowledge, ask: Where are interpretation, discretion, expertise or practical wisdom needed?", "description": "Learning & Knowledge locates the issue in education, skills, expertise, research, judgement, knowledge creation and transmission. The Judgement lens asks: Where are interpretation, discretion, expertise or practical wisdom needed?" }, { "id": "learning-knowledge__capability", "arenaId": "learning-knowledge", "arenaName": "Learning & Knowledge", "lensId": "capability", "lensName": "Capability", "prompt": "In Learning & Knowledge, ask: What human abilities are strengthened, weakened, redistributed or made newly possible?", "description": "Learning & Knowledge locates the issue in education, skills, expertise, research, judgement, knowledge creation and transmission. The Capability lens asks: What human abilities are strengthened, weakened, redistributed or made newly possible?" }, { "id": "learning-knowledge__dignity", "arenaId": "learning-knowledge", "arenaName": "Learning & Knowledge", "lensId": "dignity", "lensName": "Dignity", "prompt": "In Learning & Knowledge, ask: How are people recognised, respected, represented or reduced?", "description": "Learning & Knowledge locates the issue in education, skills, expertise, research, judgement, knowledge creation and transmission. The Dignity lens asks: How are people recognised, respected, represented or reduced?" }, { "id": "learning-knowledge__care", "arenaId": "learning-knowledge", "arenaName": "Learning & Knowledge", "lensId": "care", "lensName": "Care", "prompt": "In Learning & Knowledge, ask: Where do responsibility, attention, dependency, presence or relational obligation matter?", "description": "Learning & Knowledge locates the issue in education, skills, expertise, research, judgement, knowledge creation and transmission. The Care lens asks: Where do responsibility, attention, dependency, presence or relational obligation matter?" }, { "id": "learning-knowledge__power", "arenaId": "learning-knowledge", "arenaName": "Learning & Knowledge", "lensId": "power", "lensName": "Power", "prompt": "In Learning & Knowledge, ask: Who gains control, leverage, authority, visibility or economic advantage?", "description": "Learning & Knowledge locates the issue in education, skills, expertise, research, judgement, knowledge creation and transmission. The Power lens asks: Who gains control, leverage, authority, visibility or economic advantage?" }, { "id": "learning-knowledge__boundary", "arenaId": "learning-knowledge", "arenaName": "Learning & Knowledge", "lensId": "boundary", "lensName": "Boundary", "prompt": "In Learning & Knowledge, ask: What line between human, machine, institution, body, place or role is being moved?", "description": "Learning & Knowledge locates the issue in education, skills, expertise, research, judgement, knowledge creation and transmission. The Boundary lens asks: What line between human, machine, institution, body, place or role is being moved?" }, { "id": "learning-knowledge__meaning", "arenaId": "learning-knowledge", "arenaName": "Learning & Knowledge", "lensId": "meaning", "lensName": "Meaning", "prompt": "In Learning & Knowledge, ask: What purpose, identity, culture, interpretation or shared significance is at stake?", "description": "Learning & Knowledge locates the issue in education, skills, expertise, research, judgement, knowledge creation and transmission. The Meaning lens asks: What purpose, identity, culture, interpretation or shared significance is at stake?" }, { "id": "creativity-meaning__agency", "arenaId": "creativity-meaning", "arenaName": "Creativity & Meaning", "lensId": "agency", "lensName": "Agency", "prompt": "In Creativity & Meaning, ask: Who can choose, act, refuse, consent or shape outcomes?", "description": "Creativity & Meaning locates the issue in art, culture, expression, purpose, interpretation, imagination, values and shared meaning. The Agency lens asks: Who can choose, act, refuse, consent or shape outcomes?" }, { "id": "creativity-meaning__judgement", "arenaId": "creativity-meaning", "arenaName": "Creativity & Meaning", "lensId": "judgement", "lensName": "Judgement", "prompt": "In Creativity & Meaning, ask: Where are interpretation, discretion, expertise or practical wisdom needed?", "description": "Creativity & Meaning locates the issue in art, culture, expression, purpose, interpretation, imagination, values and shared meaning. The Judgement lens asks: Where are interpretation, discretion, expertise or practical wisdom needed?" }, { "id": "creativity-meaning__capability", "arenaId": "creativity-meaning", "arenaName": "Creativity & Meaning", "lensId": "capability", "lensName": "Capability", "prompt": "In Creativity & Meaning, ask: What human abilities are strengthened, weakened, redistributed or made newly possible?", "description": "Creativity & Meaning locates the issue in art, culture, expression, purpose, interpretation, imagination, values and shared meaning. The Capability lens asks: What human abilities are strengthened, weakened, redistributed or made newly possible?" }, { "id": "creativity-meaning__dignity", "arenaId": "creativity-meaning", "arenaName": "Creativity & Meaning", "lensId": "dignity", "lensName": "Dignity", "prompt": "In Creativity & Meaning, ask: How are people recognised, respected, represented or reduced?", "description": "Creativity & Meaning locates the issue in art, culture, expression, purpose, interpretation, imagination, values and shared meaning. The Dignity lens asks: How are people recognised, respected, represented or reduced?" }, { "id": "creativity-meaning__care", "arenaId": "creativity-meaning", "arenaName": "Creativity & Meaning", "lensId": "care", "lensName": "Care", "prompt": "In Creativity & Meaning, ask: Where do responsibility, attention, dependency, presence or relational obligation matter?", "description": "Creativity & Meaning locates the issue in art, culture, expression, purpose, interpretation, imagination, values and shared meaning. The Care lens asks: Where do responsibility, attention, dependency, presence or relational obligation matter?" }, { "id": "creativity-meaning__power", "arenaId": "creativity-meaning", "arenaName": "Creativity & Meaning", "lensId": "power", "lensName": "Power", "prompt": "In Creativity & Meaning, ask: Who gains control, leverage, authority, visibility or economic advantage?", "description": "Creativity & Meaning locates the issue in art, culture, expression, purpose, interpretation, imagination, values and shared meaning. The Power lens asks: Who gains control, leverage, authority, visibility or economic advantage?" }, { "id": "creativity-meaning__boundary", "arenaId": "creativity-meaning", "arenaName": "Creativity & Meaning", "lensId": "boundary", "lensName": "Boundary", "prompt": "In Creativity & Meaning, ask: What line between human, machine, institution, body, place or role is being moved?", "description": "Creativity & Meaning locates the issue in art, culture, expression, purpose, interpretation, imagination, values and shared meaning. The Boundary lens asks: What line between human, machine, institution, body, place or role is being moved?" }, { "id": "creativity-meaning__meaning", "arenaId": "creativity-meaning", "arenaName": "Creativity & Meaning", "lensId": "meaning", "lensName": "Meaning", "prompt": "In Creativity & Meaning, ask: What purpose, identity, culture, interpretation or shared significance is at stake?", "description": "Creativity & Meaning locates the issue in art, culture, expression, purpose, interpretation, imagination, values and shared meaning. The Meaning lens asks: What purpose, identity, culture, interpretation or shared significance is at stake?" }, { "id": "body-experience-place__agency", "arenaId": "body-experience-place", "arenaName": "Body, Experience & Place", "lensId": "agency", "lensName": "Agency", "prompt": "In Body, Experience & Place, ask: Who can choose, act, refuse, consent or shape outcomes?", "description": "Body, Experience & Place locates the issue in embodiment, health, lived experience, environment, local context, presence and the places where human life happens. The Agency lens asks: Who can choose, act, refuse, consent or shape outcomes?" }, { "id": "body-experience-place__judgement", "arenaId": "body-experience-place", "arenaName": "Body, Experience & Place", "lensId": "judgement", "lensName": "Judgement", "prompt": "In Body, Experience & Place, ask: Where are interpretation, discretion, expertise or practical wisdom needed?", "description": "Body, Experience & Place locates the issue in embodiment, health, lived experience, environment, local context, presence and the places where human life happens. The Judgement lens asks: Where are interpretation, discretion, expertise or practical wisdom needed?" }, { "id": "body-experience-place__capability", "arenaId": "body-experience-place", "arenaName": "Body, Experience & Place", "lensId": "capability", "lensName": "Capability", "prompt": "In Body, Experience & Place, ask: What human abilities are strengthened, weakened, redistributed or made newly possible?", "description": "Body, Experience & Place locates the issue in embodiment, health, lived experience, environment, local context, presence and the places where human life happens. The Capability lens asks: What human abilities are strengthened, weakened, redistributed or made newly possible?" }, { "id": "body-experience-place__dignity", "arenaId": "body-experience-place", "arenaName": "Body, Experience & Place", "lensId": "dignity", "lensName": "Dignity", "prompt": "In Body, Experience & Place, ask: How are people recognised, respected, represented or reduced?", "description": "Body, Experience & Place locates the issue in embodiment, health, lived experience, environment, local context, presence and the places where human life happens. The Dignity lens asks: How are people recognised, respected, represented or reduced?" }, { "id": "body-experience-place__care", "arenaId": "body-experience-place", "arenaName": "Body, Experience & Place", "lensId": "care", "lensName": "Care", "prompt": "In Body, Experience & Place, ask: Where do responsibility, attention, dependency, presence or relational obligation matter?", "description": "Body, Experience & Place locates the issue in embodiment, health, lived experience, environment, local context, presence and the places where human life happens. The Care lens asks: Where do responsibility, attention, dependency, presence or relational obligation matter?" }, { "id": "body-experience-place__power", "arenaId": "body-experience-place", "arenaName": "Body, Experience & Place", "lensId": "power", "lensName": "Power", "prompt": "In Body, Experience & Place, ask: Who gains control, leverage, authority, visibility or economic advantage?", "description": "Body, Experience & Place locates the issue in embodiment, health, lived experience, environment, local context, presence and the places where human life happens. The Power lens asks: Who gains control, leverage, authority, visibility or economic advantage?" }, { "id": "body-experience-place__boundary", "arenaId": "body-experience-place", "arenaName": "Body, Experience & Place", "lensId": "boundary", "lensName": "Boundary", "prompt": "In Body, Experience & Place, ask: What line between human, machine, institution, body, place or role is being moved?", "description": "Body, Experience & Place locates the issue in embodiment, health, lived experience, environment, local context, presence and the places where human life happens. The Boundary lens asks: What line between human, machine, institution, body, place or role is being moved?" }, { "id": "body-experience-place__meaning", "arenaId": "body-experience-place", "arenaName": "Body, Experience & Place", "lensId": "meaning", "lensName": "Meaning", "prompt": "In Body, Experience & Place, ask: What purpose, identity, culture, interpretation or shared significance is at stake?", "description": "Body, Experience & Place locates the issue in embodiment, health, lived experience, environment, local context, presence and the places where human life happens. The Meaning lens asks: What purpose, identity, culture, interpretation or shared significance is at stake?" } ], "reserved_source_quality_fields": [ { "field": "scale", "status": "reserved_optional", "definition": "Optional future descriptor for the size or level of the affected context. Do not use in scoring during Phase 1." }, { "field": "reach", "status": "reserved_optional", "definition": "Optional future descriptor for how widely a source's claims or evidence may apply. Do not use in scoring during Phase 1." }, { "field": "evidenceQualityNote", "status": "reserved_optional", "definition": "Optional curator note about evidence limits, uncertainty or quality. Do not use as a reliability score during Phase 1." } ] } }